
NEWSER) – NFL players are starting to feel the lockout squeeze. Earlier this month, the league stopped covering their health insurance—a step it never took during the 1982 and 1987 strikes, the Washington Post reports. That’s left players paying not just $2,000 to $3,000 a month in health insurance premiums, but thousands more for personal trainers, nutrition supplements, massages, yoga, acupuncture, and other things they say help them keep their often gigantic bodies in peak condition—and which they used to get in team training facilities.
Millionaire players paying for their own massages might not sound like a tragedy, and for most it’s not. “It’s not something we want to harp on. We should be able to afford that,” says Steelers defensive back Ryan Clark. But for players making the league minimum $320,000, the expenses add up. “You do have players who spent the whole season on the practice squad, he says. “They just can’t come up with the funds.”
Mike’s Thoughts: So, if I had to pick sides in the Owner/Player debate I’d probably side with the players mainly because the league needs to realize that their revenue stream is built on young men careening around the football field and smashing into each other and should be justly compensated for risking life and limb.
That said, if I were in a consultancy role I might suggest to the players union that they not try to garner sympathy by suggesting that their players are ’struggling’ financially during the lockout.
If you make $320,000 p year, you’re easily in the top 5% of American salaries and maybe even higher than that. And keep in mind the very LOWEST paid NFL players make at least that and most make significantly more than that.
The Union should be there for its members in “times of need” so if guys on the lower end of the pay scale are honestly having trouble meeting their financial obligations, the union should step in to offer help.
Trying to portray the players as fiscal underdogs isn’t going to play real well with the American public I don’t think.