I watched a documentary last night on the History Channel about San Tsu’s Art of War and how the principals have applied to various battles. One important principal is this: War is a means to and end, not an end in itself. When nations get caught up in the emotions of war, it becomes an end in itself. San Tsu was opposed to this because it’s wasteful. Tragedy and waste of resources don’t improve human life. That’s why it works to “Pull a Gandhi”… or an MLK. But it’s a move that only a true world-class bad ass can pull off.
When it comes to conflict in certain middle eastern regions, I always wondered which side it’s gonna be. Whether interests of the Western world in the area have exacerbated the Palestinian/Israeli conflict is up to bigger brains than mine. But I do believe it’s going to take a real BRAIN to end the conflict. Blowing up Mecca wouldn’t really help-it would probably just result in even more massive destruction.
So, who’s it gonna be? Who’s gonna do the truly difficult thing and decide to stop fighting with violence and start fighting with a strategic understanding of the other side and what will make them stop?
This quote is from MLK: “Along the way of life, someone must have sense enough and morality enough to cut off the chain of hate,”
I’ll add one thing: that someone is going to have to be a world-class bad ass. That’s what Gandhi, Dr. King and Jesus all had in common. Not just the understanding of What Must Be Done, but also the sheer bravery to actually get it done. Each knew they would die for it, and saw that as a necessary part of the equation. To oppose hatred AND do whatever is necessary to end conflict, you’ve got to be a master strategist and a total bad ass.
Extraordinarily high-functioning humans with these attributes tend to surface now and then. I’m grateful we had MLK. And I’m hoping there will be another in my lifetime.